Skip to main content

NAB ordered to transfer over Rs219m to National Highway Authority

HYDERABAD: The Accountability Court-II in Hyderabad has stopped the National Accountability Bureau from deducting 25pc of the embezzled funds recovered under plea bargain from two accused in Sukkur-Hyderabad Motorway M6 land scam case, and ordered the bureau officials to return the amount to National Highway Authority (NHA) within 15 days.


The judge, Mahboob Ali Dayo, who issued the directives the other day, noted that the NHA had sourced the funds from the coffers of taxpayers or through imposition of toll taxes on general public. Hence, the amount rightly belonged to federal government, thereby precluding NAB from asserting entitlement to 25pc share in the principal recovery amount, said the order.


The order was passed after NAB investigating officer Irfan Ali submitted a report to the court, delineating recovery of movable and immovable properties from the two accused, Ashiq Hussain Kaleri and Ikhlaq Hussain Shah through plea bargain.



Accountability court declares deduction of 25pc share from recovery under plea bargain ‘unlawful’



The amount the court had asked the NAB to return to NHA came to Rs219,529,500, which is 25pc of the total Rs878,118,000, out of which the accused Ashiq Hussain Kaleri had deposited Rs857,138,000 and his co-accused Ikhlaq Hussain Shah handed back Rs20,980,000.


The IO stated that since the 25pc share deducted by the NAB as per standard operating procedure (SOP) was Rs219,529,500 thus an amount of Rs658,588,500 was to be returned to the NHA.


The court said during endorsement of plea bargain for the recovery of Rs878,118,000 under section 25(b) of National Accountability Ordi-nance (NAO) explicit instructions were issued to NAB chairman, directing him to return the entire amount to federal government, specifically NHA, in strict conformity with statutory provisions.


The court said that subsequent scrutiny of the report revealed that Rs658,588,500 had been reimbursed to NHA and Rs219,529,500 had been deducted from the recovered amount as 25pc share for NAB. This deduction appeared bereft of justification as NAO 1999 categorically stopped NAB from effecting deductions from the recoveries.


The judge observed that records substantiate that entire aforementioned sum was released by NHA with the intent to facilitate land acquisition for M6. Despite ostensibly altruistic objectives of the project to serve general public, the accused, through collusion of each other, engaged in corrupt practices, he said.


This transgression not only resulted in malfeasance of public funds but also obstructed initiation of road construction process, consequently causing inconvenience to millions of people travelling daily on highways and roads and facing accidents due to prevailing dilapidated road conditions.


Published in Dawn, January 22nd, 2024


http://dlvr.it/T1kYwW

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sindh police chief takes notice over viral alleged aerial firing videos of DIG East’s son

Sindh Inspector General of Police (IGP) Ghulam Nabi Memon took notice after videos of aerial firing allegedly by the son of a high-ranking Karachi police official surfaced on Thursday. Videos shared on social media allegedly showed the son of Karachi East Deputy Inspector General of Police Azfar Mahesar firing a pistol and rifles into the air while travelling in a luxury car. In one such video, policemen were also purportedly visible. Footage of the alleged incidents went viral on social media. A statement issued today from the Sindh police said IGP Memon ordered an inquiry against the DIG East and directed Karachi’s additional IGP to carry out the investigation. The statement added that departmental action would be initiated upon the inquiry’s completion. It said the investigation would also probe whether the weapons used in the incident were officially issued or not. “No one will be allowed to spread fear and chaos like this,” IGP Memon vowed. Meanwhile, DIG Mahesar

Casualties feared in Dir clashes between FC, intruding militants: reports

LOWER DIR: Casualties are feared on both sides as militants from Afghanistan reportedly attacked Frontier Corps (FC) personnel at multiple locations at the Pak-Afghan border in Maidan area of Lower Dir district on Saturday, as per unconfirmed reports. According to local residents and official sources, there were reports of militants’ infiltration from the Afghan side via the Shahi border area at Lamotai Top, Suripao and Safarai forest. However, the reports were yet to be confirmed by Inter Services Public Relations, the military’s media wing. On getting information about the alleged infiltration, troops of the paramilitary force, FC, led by Captain Yasin, Captain Asfandiar and Subedar Hamza, advanced to block the militants’ movement, as per reports. The militants allegedly attacked the troops, who also retaliated, thus prompting fears of casualties on both sides. The security forces surrounded alleged militants at three different locations. Later, gunship helicopters lau

Family points finger at PPP MNA, two sons in journalist Nasrullah Gadani’s murder in Ghotki

SUKKUR: Slain journalist Nasrullah Gadani’s mother and two relatives have reiterated the allegation in statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC in a Mirpur Mathelo court that Pakistan Peoples Party’s MNA and his two sons had Nasrullah killed through their men. Ms Pathani Gadani, who was complainant in the case, and witnesses, Yaqoub Gadani and Salahuddin Gadani along with their counsel advocate Salahuddin Panhwar appeared before the second civil and first magistrate the other day and told him that PPP MNA Khalid Khan Loond, his sons, Shehbaz Loond, who was chairman of Mirpur Mathelo municipal committee, and Noor Mohammad Loond, had Nasrullah slain but the trio was so powerful that police had not dared include their names in the FIR. They appealed to the court to bring Nasrullah’s real killers to justice as per law and serve speedy justice to the bereaved family. Gadanis’ counsel Salahuddin Panhwar told media persons that the complainant and the witnesses had clearly stated t