Skip to main content

IHC verdict on in-camera cipher trial may come this week

ISLAMABAD: The Isla­m­abad High Court (IHC) is likely to rule this week on the legality of in-camera pro­ceedings in the cipher case involving former pri­me minister Imran Khan.


IHC Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb will resume hearing of a petition filed by Mr Khan against the decision of the Special Court (Official Secrets Act) to hold closed-door proceedings of the cipher case at Adiala Jail.


Justice Aurangzeb was heading a division bench that had earlier issued a detailed order, scrapping the cipher trial and linking the open proceedings of the court with transpare­ncy, impartiality and ind­e­p­endence of the judiciary.


In a judgement issued by the IHC on Dec 19, the co­urt had stressed that “pub­lic trial ensures imp­artial administration of justice”.








The judgement explai­ned the reasons for scrapping the earlier round of pro­ceedings of the Special Court (Official Secrets Act) due to lack of transparency and openness and linked the open court proceedings with the independence of the judicial system.


Mr Khan also challenged his de-novo trial in jail and also subsequent development including framing of charge, holding the proceedings in-camera and media censorship.


In the detailed order, the bench noted that the Islamabad administration, on a request of trial court judge, initiated the process to hold proceedings in jail as it informed the interior ministry about a police report that expressed certain apprehensions related to law and order if the trial is conducted in the courtroom.


The law ministry issued a notification for conducting the trial of Mr Khan in jail on the basis of this information.


The court order stated the chief commissioner on Nov 8, re-initiated the process of conducting the proceedings in jail. The interior ministry referred the letter to the law ministry which forwarded a summary to the federal cabinet seeking approval of the same.


The court noted that prior to the issuance of the notification for conducting the trial in jail, the Special Court judge had not passed any order for holding proceedings or trial in jail against which a revision could be preferred.


The court observed: “There is nothing on the record to show that prior to the notifications dated 12.09.2023, 25.09.2023, 03.10.2023, and 13.10.2023, any sanction of the Fed­eral Government (i.e. cabinet) had been obtained through the Dis­trict Magistrate for conducting the proceedings.


The bench noted lapses on the judge’s part and observed he “was expected to exercise vigilance by satisfying himself that all requirements of Section 352 CrPC and Rule 3 of LHC Rules had been fulfilled before he decided to hold court in jail premises”.


The court order cited English judgements and noted that these emphasize that “the open court principle is a hallmark of democratic society and applies to all judicial proceedings. This principle has long been recognised as a cornerstone of the common law.


Public access to courts guarantees integrity of judicial process by demonstrating that justice is administered in a non-arbitrary manner, according to the rule of law“.


Published in Dawn, December 26th, 2023


http://dlvr.it/T0d6v6

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sindh police chief takes notice over viral alleged aerial firing videos of DIG East’s son

Sindh Inspector General of Police (IGP) Ghulam Nabi Memon took notice after videos of aerial firing allegedly by the son of a high-ranking Karachi police official surfaced on Thursday. Videos shared on social media allegedly showed the son of Karachi East Deputy Inspector General of Police Azfar Mahesar firing a pistol and rifles into the air while travelling in a luxury car. In one such video, policemen were also purportedly visible. Footage of the alleged incidents went viral on social media. A statement issued today from the Sindh police said IGP Memon ordered an inquiry against the DIG East and directed Karachi’s additional IGP to carry out the investigation. The statement added that departmental action would be initiated upon the inquiry’s completion. It said the investigation would also probe whether the weapons used in the incident were officially issued or not. “No one will be allowed to spread fear and chaos like this,” IGP Memon vowed. Meanwhile, DIG Mahesar

Casualties feared in Dir clashes between FC, intruding militants: reports

LOWER DIR: Casualties are feared on both sides as militants from Afghanistan reportedly attacked Frontier Corps (FC) personnel at multiple locations at the Pak-Afghan border in Maidan area of Lower Dir district on Saturday, as per unconfirmed reports. According to local residents and official sources, there were reports of militants’ infiltration from the Afghan side via the Shahi border area at Lamotai Top, Suripao and Safarai forest. However, the reports were yet to be confirmed by Inter Services Public Relations, the military’s media wing. On getting information about the alleged infiltration, troops of the paramilitary force, FC, led by Captain Yasin, Captain Asfandiar and Subedar Hamza, advanced to block the militants’ movement, as per reports. The militants allegedly attacked the troops, who also retaliated, thus prompting fears of casualties on both sides. The security forces surrounded alleged militants at three different locations. Later, gunship helicopters lau

Family points finger at PPP MNA, two sons in journalist Nasrullah Gadani’s murder in Ghotki

SUKKUR: Slain journalist Nasrullah Gadani’s mother and two relatives have reiterated the allegation in statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC in a Mirpur Mathelo court that Pakistan Peoples Party’s MNA and his two sons had Nasrullah killed through their men. Ms Pathani Gadani, who was complainant in the case, and witnesses, Yaqoub Gadani and Salahuddin Gadani along with their counsel advocate Salahuddin Panhwar appeared before the second civil and first magistrate the other day and told him that PPP MNA Khalid Khan Loond, his sons, Shehbaz Loond, who was chairman of Mirpur Mathelo municipal committee, and Noor Mohammad Loond, had Nasrullah slain but the trio was so powerful that police had not dared include their names in the FIR. They appealed to the court to bring Nasrullah’s real killers to justice as per law and serve speedy justice to the bereaved family. Gadanis’ counsel Salahuddin Panhwar told media persons that the complainant and the witnesses had clearly stated t