Skip to main content

SC wants changes to ANF, police rules for better evidence

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has asked the provincial governments and relevant federal authorities to consider amending Anti-Narcotics Force (ANF) and Police rules for ensuring video recordings and photographs as evidence while capturing, preserving, and using narcotic substance for trials.



It is time that all institutions act professionally and use all available lawful means to obtain evidence since a credible prosecution and adjudication process improves public perception, said a Supreme Court judgement handed down by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa while heading a three-judge bench.



Poor investigation, not supported by evidence, adversely affected prosecution cases leaving courts to be burdened with bail applications because the commencement and conclusion of such trials were delayed, the CJP regretted.



The SC had taken up an appeal moved by Zahid Sarfraz Gill against the rejection of his bail plea by the Islamabad High Court on Sept 20. Mr Gill was falsely implicated in a case registered at Islamabad Secretariat Police Station on May 29, registered as a counterblast to his written complaint against some police officials on May 17.



Advocate Shoaib Shaheen, who represented the petitioner, said the record established that Mr Gill was not at the stated place of incident, but this aspect was not examined by the investigating officer when 1,833 grams of charas was allegedly recovered from the petitioner.



State counsel Rifaqat Ali, on the other hand, argued that the petitioner was caught red-handed by the police in a public place at 6pm in May and the case against him was fully established.



The apex court granted bail to the petitioner subject to furnishing of bail bond in the sum of Rs100,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court and set aside the high court order.



The SC in its verdict said Section 25 of the Act excludes the applicability of Section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, which requires two or more respectable inhabitants of the locality to be associated when such search is made. “But we fail to understand why the police and ANF members do not record or [take] photograph when search, seizure or arrest was made,” the CJP regretted.



In narcotics cases, the prosecution witnesses usually are ANF personnel or policemen who surely would have a cell phone with an in-built camera. In respect of those arrested with narcotic substances, generally there are only a few witnesses and most, if not all, are government servants, the SC noted, adding that trials were unnecessarily delayed.



If police and ANF were to use their mobile phone cameras to record or take photographs of the search, seizure and arrest, it would be useful evidence to establish the presence of the accused at the crime scene, the possession by the accused of the narcotic substances, the search and its seizure, the judgement explained.



It could also prevent false allegations being levelled against ANF and police that the narcotic substance was foisted upon them for some ulterior motives, the court observed.



Published in Dawn, November 30th, 2023


http://dlvr.it/SzVcK5

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pragmatic steps taken to implement Axle Load Control regime on NH&MP

Islamabad: Ministry of Communications has taken pragmatic steps to implement the Axle Load Control regime on Motorways & National Highways in the country. Sole objective of this move is to control travelling of overloaded vehicles which lead to fatal accidents besides damaging the national asset of road network of billions of rupees.Prior to implementation of axle load control regime, a technical committee was formed, consisting of officers from Ministry of Communications and National Highway Authority which remained in constant contacts with transport community, Members of the Chambers of Commerce and stakeholders hailing from all the provinces. This technical committee visited their offices and held detailed discussions in series of meetings and took them into confidence to facilitate implementation of Axle Load Control regime. The stakeholders assured of their full cooperation and subsequently, implementation of Axle Load Control was realized which is in progress.It is worth to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UN awards 2 Pakistani female peacekeepers for gender advocacy

The United Nations has awarded two Pakistani female peacekeepers with the Gender Advocacy Award for their “outstanding performance”, a statement from the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said. In a statement issued on Thursday, the ISPR said the awards were presented to Major Sania Safdar, part of the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Cyprus, and Major Komal Masood, who served in the Central African Republic, “for their outstanding performance and commitment in promoting the ideals of UN”. The accolades were presented by the under-secretary general in the UN’s Department for Peace Operations at its New York headquarters. “While serving in [an] international environment, both officers demonstrated exceptional professionalism [and] dedication,” the ISPR noted. It added that the two peacekeepers “made [a] significant contribution to Mission’s Peace and Stability efforts, especially with regards to advancing women’s meaningful participation in Peacekeeping Operations within the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

CJP questions how ‘clarification order’ made it to website

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa has raised nine questions in a letter to the Supreme Court’s registrar, seeking clarification on how a Sept 14 clarification order was uploaded to the top court’s website. The Sept 14 order, issued by eight judges led by senior puisne judge Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, criticised the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for failing to implement the Supreme Court’s July 12 judgement, which declared the PTI eligible for reserved seats in parliament. In his letter dated Sept 21, the CJP wondered who directed the uploading of the Sept 14 clarification order on the Supreme Court’s website. His inquiry followed a note from the Deputy Registrar (Judicial), who flagged the issue of the order’s appearance on the website. The note questioned how the order was uploaded when no cause list had been issued, no notices had been sent to the parties, and the order had not been received by the deputy registrar’s office until 8pm on the...
Post a Comment
Read more