Skip to main content

Court dismisses PM’s plea for not hearing defamation case

PESHAWAR: A local court on Wednesday dismissed an application filed by Prime Minister Imran Khan requesting to return a defamation suit filed by a former Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) female lawmaker against him as the court lacked the jurisdiction in this regard.Fauzia Bibi, the former MPA who was elected on the reserved seats for women on the PTI ticket, had filed the defamation suit for recovery of damages to the tune of Rs500 million from Imran Khan for defaming her by levelling “baseless” allegations against her in a press conference during which she was accused of selling her vote in the Senate elections.The Additional District and Sessions Judge Shah Waliullah Hamid Hashmi dismissed the application with the observation that this court has the jurisdiction to hear the defamation suit against the prime minister.The court had on January 24 reserved the decision for pronouncing it on January 30 after completion of arguments by both the parties.The court fixed February 15 for the next hearing. It directed the counsel to the premier to submit written reply to the defamation suit.The Supreme Court lawyer Babar Awan, representing the prime minister, had filed the application under Order 7 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure. He stated that the press conference in question addressed by his client was arranged in Islamabad and not in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.Babar Awan contended that the committee for taking action against the plaintiff was also constituted in Islamabad.He submitted before the court that the cause of action arose in Islamabad and it was not in the jurisdiction of the present court to deal with the case.Syed Ghufranullah Shah, representing the plaintiff (Fauzia Bibi), requested the court to dismiss the application of the prime minister as the court had jurisdiction to hear the suit.He argued that the allegations against the plaintiff were levelled in connection with the Senate elections for which she had cast vote at the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly.Syed Ghufranullah Shah argued that his client was member of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly and Imran Khan’s statement related to her stint as a lawmaker. He said the Defamation Ordinance 2002 was a special law and it had overriding effect over other laws.Fauzia Bibi had filed the suit in June 2018 under the Defamation Ordinance 2002. The only defendant in the suit is PTI chief Imran Khan, who subsequently became the prime minister.She sought an order of the court against the PTI chairman to decree Rs5 billion as damages for defaming her.It was submitted that the plaintiff was a law-abiding citizen and belonged to a respectable family.The former lawmaker claimed that she had an excellent reputation in the political and social circles. She reminded that she was made parliamentary secretary for tourism and allied services by the previous PTI government in KP.The plaintiff claimed that she followed the party policy in the Senate elections and cast her vote for the PTI candidates nominated for general and reserved seats.She stated that the defendant Imran Khan started uttering, spreading and resorting to the publication, communication and circulation of “maliciously false, baseless and oral” statements against the plaintiff.Fauzia Bibi recalled that Imran Khan used the electronic, print and social media to accuse her of horse-trading and selling her vote for money.The plaintiff said she clarified her position by taking oath on the holy Quran to deny the allegations. She said her lawsuit was also supported by an affidavit on oath.She recalled that she replied on April 28 to a show-cause notice issued by the party leadership. She claimed that an inquiry committee was formed under PTI leader Naeemul Haq, but he failed to call its meeting.She maintained that a second inquiry committee headed by Asad Qaiser, the former speaker of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly, never held its meeting. She said after waiting for a long period, she sent a legal notice to the PTI chairman through her lawyer on May 22 asking him to tender an apology or pay damages for defaming her.

from The News International - Peshawar http://bit.ly/2DMmD6b
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pragmatic steps taken to implement Axle Load Control regime on NH&MP

Islamabad: Ministry of Communications has taken pragmatic steps to implement the Axle Load Control regime on Motorways & National Highways in the country. Sole objective of this move is to control travelling of overloaded vehicles which lead to fatal accidents besides damaging the national asset of road network of billions of rupees.Prior to implementation of axle load control regime, a technical committee was formed, consisting of officers from Ministry of Communications and National Highway Authority which remained in constant contacts with transport community, Members of the Chambers of Commerce and stakeholders hailing from all the provinces. This technical committee visited their offices and held detailed discussions in series of meetings and took them into confidence to facilitate implementation of Axle Load Control regime. The stakeholders assured of their full cooperation and subsequently, implementation of Axle Load Control was realized which is in progress.It is worth to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

CJP questions how ‘clarification order’ made it to website

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa has raised nine questions in a letter to the Supreme Court’s registrar, seeking clarification on how a Sept 14 clarification order was uploaded to the top court’s website. The Sept 14 order, issued by eight judges led by senior puisne judge Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, criticised the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for failing to implement the Supreme Court’s July 12 judgement, which declared the PTI eligible for reserved seats in parliament. In his letter dated Sept 21, the CJP wondered who directed the uploading of the Sept 14 clarification order on the Supreme Court’s website. His inquiry followed a note from the Deputy Registrar (Judicial), who flagged the issue of the order’s appearance on the website. The note questioned how the order was uploaded when no cause list had been issued, no notices had been sent to the parties, and the order had not been received by the deputy registrar’s office until 8pm on the...
Post a Comment
Read more

UN awards 2 Pakistani female peacekeepers for gender advocacy

The United Nations has awarded two Pakistani female peacekeepers with the Gender Advocacy Award for their “outstanding performance”, a statement from the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said. In a statement issued on Thursday, the ISPR said the awards were presented to Major Sania Safdar, part of the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Cyprus, and Major Komal Masood, who served in the Central African Republic, “for their outstanding performance and commitment in promoting the ideals of UN”. The accolades were presented by the under-secretary general in the UN’s Department for Peace Operations at its New York headquarters. “While serving in [an] international environment, both officers demonstrated exceptional professionalism [and] dedication,” the ISPR noted. It added that the two peacekeepers “made [a] significant contribution to Mission’s Peace and Stability efforts, especially with regards to advancing women’s meaningful participation in Peacekeeping Operations within the ...
Post a Comment
Read more